tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22617239.post114937123723392308..comments2023-09-12T11:31:50.064-05:00Comments on Kingdom Come: Problem 3Pastor Rodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00219078094185232711noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22617239.post-1149464220714690742006-06-04T18:37:00.000-05:002006-06-04T18:37:00.000-05:00Luke,The short answer is that nearly all the lette...Luke,<BR/><BR/>The short answer is that nearly all the letters have a narrative context. Even Romans is built on a narrative structure.<BR/><BR/>RodPastor Rodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00219078094185232711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22617239.post-1149449080989807612006-06-04T14:24:00.000-05:002006-06-04T14:24:00.000-05:00I think Galatians is at least partially narrative....I think Galatians is at least partially narrative.<BR/><BR/>One non-HG ref is the "out of Egypt I have called my son" quote from Hosea 11:1 in Mat 2:14-15 And he rose and took the child and his mother by night and departed to Egypt and remained there until the death of Herod. This was to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet, "Out of Egypt I called my son."<BR/><BR/>In Hosea is clearlyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22617239.post-1149425945830516002006-06-04T07:59:00.000-05:002006-06-04T07:59:00.000-05:00I think the NT authors sometimes did not use the H...I think the NT authors sometimes did not use the HG method.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22617239.post-1149374048712408502006-06-03T17:34:00.000-05:002006-06-03T17:34:00.000-05:00Adam,I forgot something in my stream of consciousn...Adam,<BR/><BR/>I forgot something in my stream of consciousness: The New Testament writers did not use the historical-grammatical method in interpreting the Old Testament Scriptures.<BR/><BR/>RodPastor Rodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00219078094185232711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22617239.post-1149373844528506702006-06-03T17:30:00.000-05:002006-06-03T17:30:00.000-05:00Adam,I can see that you are having a little troubl...Adam,<BR/><BR/>I can see that you are having a little trouble with your post-modern glasses.<BR/><BR/>The first step is to see the influence that Enlightenment thinking has upon us and our theology. Jesus was not a modernist. He did not think like Descartes, Hume or Kant.<BR/><BR/>I used to explain this by saying that Jesus was an eastern teacher, not a western teacher.<BR/><BR/>[stream of Pastor Rodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00219078094185232711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22617239.post-1149371754747539362006-06-03T16:55:00.000-05:002006-06-03T16:55:00.000-05:00If the post-modern view is that the text has only ...If the post-modern view is that the text has only subjective meanings that change, and if you say that this view is self-refuting, then I am assuming you believe the text to indeed have objective meanings that do not change. Am I correct?<BR/><BR/>If I am, if you do believe that the meaning of the text is indeed objective (not changing), then why again can this non-changing meaning not be sofysthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07376113720256043376noreply@blogger.com