tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22617239.post2875750177282261028..comments2023-09-12T11:31:50.064-05:00Comments on Kingdom Come: Truth Without Risk?Pastor Rodhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00219078094185232711noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22617239.post-27274381384467513632007-03-08T17:25:00.000-06:002007-03-08T17:25:00.000-06:00Daniel,I think one of the things that Newbigin is ...Daniel,<BR/><BR/>I think one of the things that Newbigin is saying is that once we try to "prove" the Bible scientifically, we have given science the ultimate authority. This is not to say that we dodge the issue altogether. But it does require a different approach than the church has used in the past.<BR/><BR/>The narrative "apologetic" is more or less the right approach, I think.<BR/><BR/>Of Pastor Rodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00219078094185232711noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22617239.post-75110584450665824172007-03-08T12:55:00.000-06:002007-03-08T12:55:00.000-06:00This was a very thought provoking post...Working f...This was a very thought provoking post...<BR/><BR/>Working from the end up:<BR/><BR/>I don't think traditional apologetics are worthless. They have their place. I do, however, think that a steady diet of that stuff can induce a "methinks she doth protest too much" mindset in the hearers. I also think that traditional apologetics answers questions that people don't ask very much anymore (or daniel the smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17667139864261512522noreply@blogger.com